We address the technical requirements of
NIS2UKSCDORACRA

How it looks today

Before we propose anything, we describe the state we usually find.

The tools are bought and switched on, reports arrive regularly and no one reads them. The list is too long, priorities come from an automatic score detached from your context, and fixes compete with product work.

What we do

We define the scope after an assessment. Rarely do all four elements come in at once.

We turn an endless report into a short list.

We collect results from code, libraries, images and infrastructure in one place, so the team stops switching between five consoles. We set priorities to your context — what matters is whether a vulnerability is reachable in your system at all, not a score detached from the architecture. We wire fixes into where the team already works, with a clear deadline, instead of creating a separate task queue no one opens. We measure what actually gets closed, so it is possible to show how much risk was removed.

TrivySemgrepGrafanaGitLab CI

Four stages

01

We collect results in one place

Code, libraries, images, infrastructure — one view instead of five consoles.

02

We set priorities to your context

What matters is whether a vulnerability is reachable in your system, not the score itself.

03

We wire fixes into normal work

The task lands where the team already works, with a clear deadline.

04

We measure what gets closed

It is visible what has been fixed, and what is waiting and why.

What stays with you

The team works on a short list instead of an endless report

It is visible how much risk was actually removed

Answering an auditor takes a moment, not a week

Questions we get
most often

How long does it take?+

We define the scope after a call and an assessment. Smaller engagements close in a few weeks; larger ones we split into stages, so the result is visible after the first.

Do we have to give you access to the code?+

Usually not to all of it. In most cases access to the build pipeline configuration and organization settings is enough. We define the scope in writing before we start.

Does our team have to get involved?+

Yes, but not full time. We need contact with someone who knows the system, and a review of our changes. The rest is on us.

What if we already have tools?+

We plug into what already works for you. Replacing a tool is the most expensive and least often necessary way to improve security.

Do we become dependent on you?+

You don't have to. We work with standards and tools your team knows or will quickly learn — not a proprietary method only we understand. Everything is documented and handed over.

Won't this slow down releases?+

We wire controls so they run in the background. If one starts blocking work, we tune it or move it to a different point in the process.

Want to reduce risk
and IT costs?

Book a free call →
We reply within 24h on business days