We address the technical requirements of
NIS2UKSCDORAISO 27001

How it looks today

Before we propose anything, we describe the state we usually find.

Security shows up at the end: before release, before an audit, or after a customer asks. At that point every finding is expensive, because finished work has to be undone. The team treats it as an obstacle, not as part of the job.

What we do

We define the scope after an assessment. Rarely do all four elements come in at once.

We go where the software is actually made.

We start by seeing how your team actually works — not how it looks on a diagram in the documentation. Only then do we decide at which points in the process a security control makes sense and won't block delivery. We wire the mechanisms into the tools the team already uses, and tune them until they stop producing false alarms — because a control no one reads is worse than none. Finally we hand the process over to the team along with documentation, so they can maintain it without us.

GitLab CISemgrepTrivyVault

Four stages

01

We map the current process

We check how your software is really made — from idea to release. Not how it looks on a diagram.

02

We identify control points

We determine at which points in the process a security control makes sense and won't block the work.

03

We implement and tune

We wire the mechanisms into the team's existing tools. Until they stop producing false alarms.

04

We hand it to the team

We leave a process the team understands and can maintain without us.

What stays with you

Risk surfaces at a stage where the fix is cheap

Security stops being a separate step before release

The team has clear rules instead of a list of after-the-fact comments

Questions we get
most often

How long does it take?+

We define the scope after a call and an assessment. Smaller engagements close in a few weeks; larger ones we split into stages, so the result is visible after the first.

Do we have to give you access to the code?+

Usually not to all of it. In most cases access to the build pipeline configuration and organization settings is enough. We define the scope in writing before we start.

Does our team have to get involved?+

Yes, but not full time. We need contact with someone who knows the system, and a review of our changes. The rest is on us.

What if we already have tools?+

We plug into what already works for you. Replacing a tool is the most expensive and least often necessary way to improve security.

Do we become dependent on you?+

You don't have to. We work with standards and tools your team knows or will quickly learn — not a proprietary method only we understand. Everything is documented and handed over.

Won't this slow down releases?+

We wire controls so they run in the background. If one starts blocking work, we tune it or move it to a different point in the process.

Want to reduce risk
and IT costs?

Book a free call →
We reply within 24h on business days