We address the technical requirements of
DORANIS2UKSC

How it looks today

Before we propose anything, we describe the state we usually find.

Logs are collected because someone once set it up that way. No one looks at them until there is an incident — and then it turns out that this one event was not recorded, or retention ran out two weeks ago.

What we do

We define the scope after an assessment. Rarely do all four elements come in at once.

A signal when something really is happening.

We start by deciding what should be visible — not everything at once, only events that actually mean something, because a flood of alerts ends with them being switched off. We build a single view showing whether the process and environment are in order, so the board does not have to ask the team about the security state. We route alerts to the person who can respond, together with a description of what to do. Finally we simulate an event and check whether the notification actually arrived — because monitoring untested in practice is an assumption, not a safeguard.

PrometheusGrafanaFalcoKubernetes

Four stages

01

We decide what should be visible

Not everything at once — the events that actually mean something.

02

We build a state view

One screen showing whether the process and environment are in order.

03

We set up alerts

The notification goes to a person who can respond, with a description of what to do.

04

We test in practice

We simulate an event and see whether the alert actually arrived.

What stays with you

An unusual event surfaces in hours, not weeks

During an incident there is something to reconstruct the sequence from

The board sees the security state without asking the team

Questions we get
most often

How long does it take?+

We define the scope after a call and an assessment. Smaller engagements close in a few weeks; larger ones we split into stages, so the result is visible after the first.

Do we have to give you access to the code?+

Usually not to all of it. In most cases access to the build pipeline configuration and organization settings is enough. We define the scope in writing before we start.

Does our team have to get involved?+

Yes, but not full time. We need contact with someone who knows the system, and a review of our changes. The rest is on us.

What if we already have tools?+

We plug into what already works for you. Replacing a tool is the most expensive and least often necessary way to improve security.

Do we become dependent on you?+

You don't have to. We work with standards and tools your team knows or will quickly learn — not a proprietary method only we understand. Everything is documented and handed over.

Won't this slow down releases?+

We wire controls so they run in the background. If one starts blocking work, we tune it or move it to a different point in the process.

Want to reduce risk
and IT costs?

Book a free call →
We reply within 24h on business days