We design security practices and implement them in your process — so the team keeps shipping at its pace while evidence for auditors and enterprise clients is produced as part of normal work.
We design how security should be wired into the way you work — and we implement it, not just describe it.
We implement threat modeling as a permanent part of feature design — not as a one-off workshop that dies after a quarter.
We wire code, dependency and configuration analysis into where changes actually happen — so a problem surfaces at writing, not at release. We tune thresholds so the signal is useful, not so a checklist gets ticked.
We give you a way to prove what exactly ended up in the released product and where it came from — for when a client or an auditor asks.
We build the layer your teams work on: deployment patterns, templates and default settings that are secure from first use. A developer doesn't have to remember the configuration — they get it ready-made.
When the team already has the skills and needs direction, not a contractor — we work as decision support. Architecture reviews, tool selection, settling technical disputes, audit preparation.
Implementation in a team that already has an ordered process is different work than in a company where everything has to be built from scratch. That is why we start with an assessment — without it the scope would be guesswork.
One area, one team. For example: automating controls in the build process.
A full implementation: process, threat modeling, automation, evidence.
For companies that want to develop the process over time, not close it with a single project.
We bill in stages: you pay for each next stage once the previous one has shown a visible result, and ongoing care can be ended month to month. If you preceded the implementation with an assessment from us, we factor its cost into the quote.
The changes are in your system, running and tested against the team's real work. Versioned and reversible — if something doesn't work, it rolls back with a single command.
After implementation we hand over the mechanism with documentation and training — and you have a choice. You can run it yourselves or leave it in our care: tool updates, response to new vulnerabilities, threshold tuning, support during audits and client questionnaires. We bill this monthly.
What an auditor or an enterprise client demands is generated in the course of normal work. Instead of collecting evidence in reverse before an audit, you simply show it. We close the technical layer of the requirements; you handle the organisational and legal part with your team and adviser — based on the same evidence.
The build and deploy pipeline has access to everything. We secure it so it stops being the…
See the area →A cluster on defaults works fine and is wide open. We lock it down without…
See the area →Cloud configuration and permissions described as code — checked before they exist, not after…
See the area →Yes, to the extent agreed in writing before we start. Usually access to the build pipeline configuration and organization settings is enough — not to all the code. We apply the principle of least privilege to ourselves too.
Yes, but not full time. We need contact with someone who knows the system, and a review of our changes by the team — that is standard, not an extra burden. We work together with your team, at its pace.
That is the right question and we take it seriously. A control that adds fifteen minutes to a build or floods people with false alarms will be switched off within a week — and rightly so. That is why we measure the impact on build time and tune thresholds until the signal is useful.
No. We work with standards and tools your team knows or will quickly learn — not a proprietary method only we understand. After implementation you can run it yourselves; if you can't, we did the work badly.
It is different when you yourselves want to leave it in our ongoing care: updates, new vulnerabilities, threshold tuning, support during audits. That is a choice, not a condition — and you can walk away from it month to month.
You can, if you have a fresh audit report or know exactly what you want. But then the quote is based on your assumptions, not our measurement — and the risk that the scope turns out different sits on both sides. It is usually cheaper to start with an assessment.
We will tell you right away and propose a change of scope. Finishing an implementation we know won't solve your problem would be a waste of your money and our reputation.